Menu Top




Social Stratification (General Concepts)



Social Stratification

Social stratification is a fundamental concept in sociology that refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. This system of structured inequality is not about individual differences in talent or ability, but is a characteristic of society itself. It is a way of organising people into different layers or 'strata' based on their access to valued resources such as wealth, power, and prestige.

All socially stratified systems share four key principles:

  1. It is a trait of society, not simply a reflection of individual differences. Society itself structures opportunities and rewards, giving some people more advantages than others.
  2. It persists over generations. Parents pass their social position on to their children, meaning that one's life chances are heavily influenced by the family one is born into.
  3. It is universal but variable. While some form of stratification exists in all societies, what is considered valuable and how unequal the system is varies from one society to another.
  4. It involves not just inequality but also beliefs and ideologies. Every system of inequality is supported by an ideology that explains and justifies the arrangement as fair, natural, or inevitable.

While various systems of stratification like slavery and the estate system have existed historically, the two most significant forms, particularly in the modern world and in the Indian context, are caste and class.

A pyramid diagram illustrating social stratification. The top layer is small, labeled 'Upper Class,' the middle layer is larger, labeled 'Middle Class,' and the bottom layer is the largest, labeled 'Lower Class,' showing the hierarchical structure of society.

Caste

The caste system is a rigid form of social stratification where a person's social position is determined by the group they are born into. It is a classic example of an ascribed status, as an individual's caste is fixed at birth and cannot be changed through individual achievement. The Indian caste system, traditionally associated with Hinduism, is the most well-known and complex example of this form of stratification.

Characteristics of the Caste System

The sociologist G.S. Ghurye identified the main features of the caste system in India as follows:

Caste in Contemporary India

While the caste system has undergone significant changes due to urbanisation, education, and legal reforms (like the abolition of untouchability and the implementation of reservation policies), it continues to be a powerful force in Indian society. Its influence is visible in politics (caste-based voting blocs), marriage (the prevalence of caste-based matrimonial advertisements), and patterns of economic inequality. There is a strong and persistent correlation between caste and class, with lower-caste groups being disproportionately represented among the poor and marginalized.


Class

A class is a large-scale grouping of people who share a common economic position in society. Unlike caste, class is an achieved status, at least in theory. A class system is more open, and it allows for social mobility—the movement of individuals up or down the class hierarchy based on their achievements, education, and efforts. Class is the primary form of stratification in modern industrial and capitalist societies.

The Marxist and Weberian Perspectives

The two most influential sociological theories of class come from Karl Marx and Max Weber.

Caste and Class: A Comparison

Basis of Comparison Caste System Class System
Nature of Status Ascribed (determined by birth) Achieved (based on effort/merit)
Social Mobility Closed system; mobility is not possible. Open system; mobility is possible.
Basis of Stratification Ritual (purity and pollution) Economic (wealth and income)
Rules of Marriage Endogamous (marriage within the group) Exogamous; choice is permitted.
Social Interaction Governed by strict rules and restrictions. Relatively free and unrestricted.

The Interplay of Caste and Class in India

In contemporary India, the relationship between caste and class is complex and dynamic. While they are analytically distinct, they are empirically intertwined.

Example 1. The Overlap of Caste and Class

Statistical data consistently shows that communities belonging to the upper castes (like Brahmins and Baniyas) have, on average, higher levels of income, education, and representation in white-collar professions compared to communities belonging to the Scheduled Castes (Dalits) and Scheduled Tribes (Adivasis). This demonstrates how historical advantages and disadvantages associated with the caste system have translated into the modern class structure. A person's caste continues to be a significant factor in determining their class position.

However, the relationship is not absolute. Due to processes like affirmative action, urbanisation, and economic development, social mobility has occurred. There is now a small but significant 'Dalit middle class' and a 'Dalit elite' who have achieved economic success. At the same time, economic hardship can affect people from all castes, leading to the phenomenon of 'poor Brahmins'. This shows that while caste remains a powerful axis of inequality, the class structure in India is becoming increasingly complex and cannot be reduced to caste alone.